Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 22;10:12130. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68930-2

Table 3.

Percentages of peripheral blood immune cell subsets.

Cell type (%) PW group (n = 18) HW group (n = 19) PW versus HW
Baseline Week 4 Baseline Week 4 P
CD4 40.2 ± 9.0 36.7 ± 10.2 – 3.5 ± 4.8** 38.2 ± 7.3 35.8 ± 8.6 – 2.4 ± 3.6** 0.443
CD8 30.9 ± 6.6 26.1 ± 7.0 – 4.8 ± 2.1*** 32.2 ± 7.4 27.8 ± 7.2 – 4.5 ± 2.6*** 0.642
CD20 10.0 ± 3.2 11.0 ± 3.2 1.1 ± 3.0 9.0 ± 2.0 10.5 ± 2.9 1.5 ± 2.5* 0.900
CD14 7.2 ± 3.6 10.2 ± 10.7 2.9 ± 11.9 5.6 ± 2.3 5.0 ± 2.9 – 0.6 ± 3.5 0.039
CD11b 34.1 ± 6.5 36.8 ± 12.3 2.7 ± 13.6 31.6 ± 6.1 33.7 ± 10.4 2.1 ± 8.7 0.634

All values are means ± SDs. Percentages indicate the percent of live cells expressing the indicated cell surface markers. There were no significant differences between PW and HW groups for all immune cell frequencies at baseline on the basis of an unpaired t test or a Mann–Whitney U test. ∆ indicates the change from baseline to week 4. Significant differences between baseline and week 4 within each group were determined with a paired t test (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001). P values were obtained with the use of a general linear model adjusting for the value at baseline as a covariate. PW, plain water; HW, H2-rich water.