Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 24;27(8):2010–2017. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.06.030

Table 3.

Effect of deficit irrigation regimes, deferential irrigation water salinity and plant bioregulators on biochemical traits.

Treatments/ Studied traits

Pearl millet


Wheat

Years MI (%) Proline (mg g−1 FW) LP (nmole g−1 FW MI (%) Proline (mg g−1 FW) LP (nmole g−1 FW
2016/2016–17 35.02A 2.49A 6.85A 43.65B 2.32 2.34B
2017/2017–2018 23.21B 2.08B 5.57B 45.58A 2.55 2.46A
SEd± 0.50 0.09 0.16 0.39 0.10 0.03
CD (P = 0.05) 1.11 0.19 0.37 0.88 NS 0.07
Deficit irrigation regimes
I1 (100% ET) 28.46 2.18 6.14 43.29B 2.18C 2.38
I2 (80% ET) 29.18 2.32 6.22 44.75A 2.44B 2.39
I3 (60% ET) 29.71 2.35 6.26 45.80A 2.68A 2.43
SEd± 0.61 0.10 0.20 0.48 0.12 0.04
CD (P = 0.05) NS NS NS 1.07 0.28 NS
Differential salinity levels
S0 (2 dS m−1) 25.00D 1.63D 5.43C 42.77C 2.11D 2.25B
S1 (4 dS m−1) 27.79C 1.85C 5.57C 43.82BC 2.31C 2.29B
S2 (8 dS m−1) 30.33B 2.57B 6.72B 44.87B 2.51B 2.45A
S3 (12 dS m−1) 33.34A 3.07A 7.10A 46.99A 2.81A 2.45A
SEd± 0.84 0.10 0.19 0.64 0.07 0.06
CD (P = 0.05) 1.66 0.19 0.37 1.26 0.13 0.12
PBRs
G0 (control) 34.63A 2.67A 7.41A 46.06A 2.65A 2.40
G1 (1 mM SA) 26.61B 2.11B 5.60B 44.09B 2.41B 2.40
G2(500 ppm TU) 26.10B 2.07B 5.61B 43.70B 2.24C 2.40
SEd± 0.73 0.08 0.16 0.55 0.06 0.05
CD (P = 0.05) 1.44 0.17 0.32 1.09 0.12 NS

Data presented are means ± S.E.M of three independent replications. Two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test was used for analysis. Different letters denote significant differences at p < 0.05. MI – membrane injury; LP – Lipid peroxidation.