Skip to main content
. 2020 May 25;55(8):731–741. doi: 10.1007/s00535-020-01686-8

Table 2.

Imaging studies of hepatic steatosis and potential confounding factors

Test Potential confounding factors
Abdominal ultrasonography

Difficult examination in obese patients and patients with high riding liver and focal fatty sparing

Accuracy may be lower in older patients and patients with significant liver fibrosis

Operator experience

Computed tomography Hepatic iron content may affect liver attenuation
Controlled attenuation parameter

Failure rate higher in obese patients

Accuracy may also be lower in obese patients

Proton-magnetic resonance spectroscopy or magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat faction Hepatic iron content may affect the measurement of hepatic fat fraction, but this can be corrected during analysis