Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 22;183(1):161–175. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05752-w

Table 4.

Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models for overall survival

Variables in model Hazard ratio 95% confidence interval p
Grade (1 ref)
 Grade 2 0.92 0.08–10.80 0.949
 Grade 3 10.55 0.39–287.98 0.163
Mitotic score (1 ref)
 Mitotic score 2 0.42 0.04–4.85 0.487
 Mitotic score 3 0.21 0.01–3.64 0.284
pN stagea (pN1 vs pN0) 2.28 0.73–7.14 0.158
Ki67 DIA hot spot APP24 scoring (≥ 20% vs < 20%) 2.93 0.50–17.35 0.236
Grade (1 ref)
 Grade 2 1.05 0.09–11.62 0.971
 Grade 3 6.25 0.23–171.59 0.278
Mitotic score (1 ref)
 Mitotic score 2 0.30 0.03–3.70 0.348
 Mitotic score 3 0.19 0.01–3.40 0.261
pN stagea (pN1 vs pN0) 1.87 0.61–5.75 0.277
Ki67 DIA global scoring (≥ 20% vs < 20%) 7.11 1.09–46.46 0.040*
Grade (1 ref)
 Grade 2 1.09 0.10–12.06 0.944
 Grade 3 13.32 0.51–348.73 0.120
Mitotic score (1 ref)
 Mitotic score 2 0.70 0.06–8.23 0.778
 Mitotic score 3 0.50 0.03–9.40 0.645
pN stagea (pN1 vs pN0) 1.60 0.51–5.01 0.423
Ki67 manual hot spot scoring (≥ 20% vs < 20%) 0.72 0.20–2.65 0.620

DIA digital image analysis

*p significant at a < 0.05 level

aPathologic N stage for regional lymph nodes according to AJCC Breast Cancer Staging 7th Edition (TNM 7)