Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 30;109(8):1035–1047. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01597-x

Table 3.

Multiple logistic regression analysis of factors used for differentiating between patients with and those without heart failure

Predictor OR (95% CI) P
Clinical base model
 Agea 1.026 (1.007–1.046) 0.007
 Dyspnea score 1.385 (1.095–1.753) 0.007
 Systolic BPa 1.015 (1.001–1.028) 0.034
 Charlson comorbidity index 1.180 (1.050–1.324) 0.005
 Previous history of HF 3.470 (1.565–7.696) 0.002
 Severe valve disease 4.388 (1.171–16.444) 0.028
 ECW:TBW ratio 2.634 (1.367–5.075) 0.004
Model 0b: clinical + NT-proBNP 2.505 (1.630–3.847)  < 0.001
Model 1b: clinical + NT-proBNP + GDF-15 2.730 (1.801–4.139)  < 0.001
Model 2b: clinical + NT-proBNP + cNEP activity 3.010 (1.965–4.613)  < 0.001
Model 3b: clinical + NT-proBNP + GDF-15 + cNEP activity 3.822 (2.388–6.117)  < 0.001

a The odds ratio for age and systolic BP represents the exponent for each year of age and each mmHg in the logistic equation, respectively

bModels 0–3 denote the clinical base model supplemented with respective information on sex-normalized log-transformed biomarkers

BP blood pressure, cNEP circulating neprilysin, CI confidence interval, ECW extracellular water, GDF-15 growth differentiation factor-15, HF congestive heart failure, NT-proBNP N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide, OR Odds ratio, TBW total body water