Skip to main content
. 2020 May 25;50(8):1483–1499. doi: 10.1007/s40279-020-01293-w

Table 3.

Methodological quality of the included studies based on the physiotherapy evidence database (PEDro) scale

Study Eligibility criteria Randomized assignation Blinded assignation Group homogeneity Blinded subjects Blinded coaches Blinded investigator Dropout < 15% Intention-to-treat Group comparisons Point and variability measures Total PEDro score
Prieske et al. [45] + + + + + + 6
Torres-Torrelo et al. [63] + + + + + + + 6
McBride et al. [44] + + + + + + 5
Hammami et al. [48] + + + + + + + 6
Negra et al. [47] + + + + + + + 6
Negra et al. [46] + + + + + + + 6
Christou et al. [43] + + + + + 4
Tricoli et al. [64] + + + + + 4
Whitehead et al. [66] + + + + + 4
Kraemer et al. [67] + + + + + + + 6
Yildiz et al. [65] + + + + + + 5
Barbalho et al. [71] + + + + + + 5
Aloui et al. [70] + + + + + + + 6
Deane et al. [69] + + + + + 4
Hammami et al. [68] + + + + + + + 6

The eligibility criteria have to be excluded for calculation of the total PEDro score; “+” = indicates a ‘‘yes’’ score; “−’’ = indicates a ‘‘no’’ score