Skip to main content
. 2020 May 6;34(7):877–889. doi: 10.1177/0269215520916859

Table 3.

The summarized comparisons of subjects’ experiences/tolerance/side effects of taping.a

Experiences/opinions/observational data Group Yes % (subjects) No % (subjects) Comparison between groups, p value
Sense of mild intermittent wetness and/or cold under the tapes KT 11.1 (9) 88.9 (72) p=0.012
NT 1.3 (1) 98.7 (75)
Sense of mild intermittent warmth under the tapes KT 9.9 (8) 90.1 (73) p = 0.277
NT 5.3 (4) 94.7 (72)
Mild intermittent itching under the tapes KT 8.6 (7) 91.4 (74) p = 0.407
NT 5.3 (4) 94.7 (72)
Mild intermittent paresthetic sensation (burning, tingling, pricking) under the tapes KT 9.9 (8) 90.1 (73) p = 0.887
NT 9.2 (7) 90.8 (69)
Indicated stair climbing alleviation when with tapes KT 11.1 (9) 88.9 (72) p=0.038
NT 2.6 (2) 97.4 (74)
Alleviation in changing body position and/or general mobility (expressed as “my knee feels more stable,” “strengthened,” “less fear to move,” “I feel enforcement” when with tapes) KT 44.4 (36) 55.6 (45) p=0.003
NT 22.4 (17) 77.6 (59)
Observed mild skin reactions/irritation or skin lesionsb KT 11.1 (9) 88.9 (72) p = 0.906
NT 10.5 (8) 89.5 (68)

KT: Kinesio Taping® group; NT: control (non-specific taping) group.

a

The results that are presented in this table comprise summarized data acquired during the single-blinded assessments by a certified Kinesio Taping practitioner (only the patient was blinded to intervention).

b

All observed skin reactions were mild and did not require any treatment or discontinuation of taping (mild erythema, small areas of pealing of superficial epidermis layers, mild rashes, few petechiae were among those that were observed).