Table 3.

Results of the Friedmann’s test to compare the different strain measurements in patients and healthy subjects, showing the adjusted significance level from the Dunn-Bonferoni post-hoc test (p) as well as the effect size (r) of the different comparisons

Patients (n = 57)	p	r
SENC vs. STE
SENC vs. STE-FWLS	0.049	0.11
SENC vs. STE-GLS	1.000	/
FT vs. STE
Endo-FT vs. STE -FWLS	< 0.001	0.18
Myo-FT vs. STE-FWLS	0.059	/
Endo-FT vs. STE-GLS	< 0.001	0.36
Myo-FT vs. STE-GLS	< 0.001	0.28
SENC vs. FT
SENC vs. Endo-FT	< 0.001	0.29
SENC vs. Myo-FT	< 0.001	0.22
Healthy subjects (n = 17)
SENC vs. FT
SENC vs. Endo-FT	< 0.001	0.47
SENC vs. Myo-FT	0.006	0.26

Abbreviations: GLS Global longitudinal strain, FWLS Free wall longitudinal strain, STE Speckle tracking echocardiography, SENC Strain-encoding, FT Feature tracking, Endo-FT Subendocardial strain determined using FT, Myo-FT Midmyocardial strain determined using FT