Table 1.
March, 1978 | Minimal (< ¼ of cavity; thin, filmy), moderate (¼–¾ of cavity; no agglutination of walls, partial occlusion of ostia) or severe (> ¾ of cavity, agglutination of walls, thick bands or involving tubal ostia) based on hysteroscopic (HSC) assessment of cavity involvement |
Hamou, 1983 | Isthmic, marginal, central or severe based on HSC |
Valle, 1988 | Mild (filmy adhesions composed of basal endometrium producing partial or complete uterine cavity occlusion), moderate (fibromuscular adhesions with thick bands covered with endometrium that may bleed when divided) or severe (bands composed of connective tissue lacking endometrium) based on HSC and extent of occlusion based on HSG |
American Fertility Society, 1988 | Mild, moderate or severe based on endometrial cavity obliteration, appearance of adhesions on HSC/HSG and patient menstrual characteristics |
European Society of Hysteroscopy, 1989 | Grade I-IV based on HSC, HSG and clinical symptoms |
Donnez, 1994 | Six grades based on location; HSC, HSG used for assessment |
Nasr, 2000 | Prognostic score by incorporating menstrual and obstetric history with IUA findings on HSC |
Adopted from: AAGL practice report: practice guidelines on intrauterine adhesions developed in collaboration with the European Society of Gynecological Endoscopy (ESGE) [2]