Skip to main content
. 2020 May 25;37(7):1703–1710. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01793-8

Table 3.

Comparison of clinical outcomes of IVF-ET cycles among the four groups

Control 1, 9, 16qh+/− group D/G group inv(9)
No. of case 908 90 33 44
No. oocytes retrieved 13.67 ± 5.87 12.41 ± 6.93 13.88 ± 7.83 13.59 ± 8.39
1PN fertilization rate (%) 3.45 ± 6.01 4.40 ± 1.25 2.07 ± 3.99 1.71 ± 7.71
2PN fertilization rate (%) 56.39 ± 19.46 57.19 ± 23.44 57.41 ± 23.92 57.49 ± 27.33
Multi-PN fertilization rate (%) 9.73 ± 10.75 9.07 ± 10.78 10.28 ± 16.01 5.49 ± 8.09
Fertilization rate (%) 69.58 ± 19.44 70.44 ± 21.03 67.59 ± 25.52 64.70 ± 26.80
2PN cleavage rate (%) 97.66 ± 7.15 96.36 ± 16.07 92.59 ± 23.84a 88.58 ± 29.17a
Quality embryo rate (%) 54.48 ± 24.92 53.04 ± 27.99 53.74 ± 26.23 55.69 ± 32.93
Implantation rate (%) 32.4 (394/1215) 30.4 (38/125) 30.8 (12/39) 37.5 (18/48)
Clinical pregnancy rate (%) 47.3 (298/630) 47.0 (31/66) 45 (9/20) 58.3 (14/24)
Early miscarriage rate (%) 3.0 (9/298) 3.2 (1/31)* 0 (0/9) 21.4 (3/14)b*

aP < 0.05, difference between chromosomal polymorphisms group and the control group

bP < 0.01, difference between chromosomal polymorphisms group and the control group

PN pronuclei

*Fisher’s exact test

All continuous variables are expressed as mean ± SD