Skip to main content
. 2020 May 25;37(7):1703–1710. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01793-8

Table 4.

Comparison of the outcomes of ICSI-ET cycles among the four groups

Control 1, 9, 16qh+/− group D/G group inv(9)
No. of case 180 39 22 18
No. oocytes retrieved 12.93 ± 5.61 14.31 ± 6.69 15.91 ± 6.54 13.56 ± 8.34
1PN fertilization rate 2.49 ± 4.82 3.37 ± 6.81 1.76 ± 3.72 5.53 ± 6.32
2PN fertilization rate 54.03 ± 20.84 55.45 ± 19.63 53.93 ± 20.07 56.13 ± 23.97
Multi-PN fertilization rate 1.87 ± 4.84 1.92 ± 3.64 1.45 ± 3.44 1.34 ± 3.63
Fertilization rate (%) 59.07 ± 19.02 60.74 ± 19.53 57.13 ± 19.24 63.00 ± 22.82
2PN cleavage rate (%) 97.16 ± 11.52 95.11 ± 17.93 98.46 ± 4.24 93.03 ± 23.45
Quality embryo rate (%) 52.33 ± 28.15 57.18 ± 32.22 59.27 ± 18.34 50.46 ± 28.69
Implantation rate (%) 23.69 (59/190) 28.6 (16/56) 44.8 (13/29)a 30.8 (8/26)
Clinical pregnancy rate (%) 40.65 (50/123) 37.9 (11/29) 78.6 (11/14)a 61.5 (8/13)
Early miscarriage rate (%) 2 (1/50)* 9.1 (1/11)* 0 (0/11) 50 (4/8)b*

aP value < 0.05, difference between chromosomal polymorphisms group and control group

bP value < 0.01, difference between chromosomal polymorphisms group and control group

PN pronuclei

*Fisher’s exact test

All continuous variables are expressed as mean ± SD