Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 8;5(28):17423–17430. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c01834

Table 3. Comparison of Different Methods for 8-Oxo-dG Analysisa.

detection method LOD detection range detection time
Rayleigh light scattering*39 27.3 pM 90.8 pM–14.1 nM 25 min
resonance light scattering43 11 pM 32 pM–12 nM 45 min
fluorescence*44 1.19 nM 3.96–211 nM 65 min
fluorescence45 4 pM 0.02–70 nM 9 h 25 min
chiroplasmonic*42 33 pM 0.05–2 nM 60 min
high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS)*46 0.35 aM 0.18 fM–0.706 pM 11 min
electrochemical*30 2.5 pM 10 pM–100 μM 2 h 40 min
electrochemical47 36.67 nM 0.05–536.5 μM  
electrochemiluminescence48 25 fM 100 fM–10 nM  
fluorometric and colorimetric*49 ∼350 pM 0.5–500 nM 30 min
colorimetric*50 141 pM 466 pM–247 nM 1.50 h
colorimetric*51 1.7 nM 5.6–282 nM 25 min
present work (66-nt aptasensor with a portable device) 9.8 nM 15–100 nM 30 min
a

The detection methods using the same aptamer as the present work (66-nt aptamer) are denoted with asterisks (*).