Table I.
Summary of the efficacy data of anlotinib in key clinical trials.
Author (year) | Phase | Design | Tumor type | No. of patients | Outcomes (anlotinib vs. control) | (Refs.) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sun et al (2016) | I | Dose escalation, open-label | Advanced refractory solid tumors | 35 | MTD: 12 mg qd Recommended regime: 12 mg qd, 2-week on/1-week off | (34) |
Han et al (2018) | II | Randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled | Refractory advanced non-small-cell lung cancer | 117 | mPFS: 4.8 vs. 1.2 months mOS: 9.3 vs. 6.3 months | (37) |
Cheng et al (2018) | II | Randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled | Relapsed small cell lung cancer | 120 | mPFS: 4.1 vs. 0.7 months mOS: Data not sufficiently mature for analysis | (38) |
Chi et al (2018) | II | Multicenter, single-arm sarcoma | Refractory metastatic soft tissue | 166 | mPFS: 5.6 months mOS: 12 months | (43) |
Sun et al (2018) | II | Multicenter, single-arm | Locally advanced or metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma | 58 | PFS rate (at 48 weeks): 85.5% PR: 56.90% | (54) |
Zhou et al (2019) | II | Centrally randomized, multicenter, sunitinib-controlled | Metastatic renal cell carcinoma | 133 | mPFS: 17.5 vs. 16.6 months mOS: 30.9 vs. 30.5 months | (62) |
Huang et al (2019) | II | Randomized, multicenter, double-blind | Advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma | 164 | mPFS: 3.02 vs. 1.41 months mOS: 6.11 vs. 7.20 months DCR: 64.22% vs. 18.18% | (63) |
Han et al (2018) | III | Randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm | Advanced non-small-cell lung cancer | 439 | mPFS: 5.4 vs. 1.4 months | (65) |
DCR, disease control rate; mOS, median overall survival; mPFS, median progression-free survival; MTD, maximum tolerated dose; PR, partial response.