Skip to main content
. 2020 May 28;20(2):1001–1014. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.11685

Table I.

Summary of the efficacy data of anlotinib in key clinical trials.

Author (year) Phase Design Tumor type No. of patients Outcomes (anlotinib vs. control) (Refs.)
Sun et al (2016) I Dose escalation, open-label Advanced refractory solid tumors 35 MTD: 12 mg qd Recommended regime: 12 mg qd, 2-week on/1-week off (34)
Han et al (2018) II Randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled Refractory advanced non-small-cell lung cancer 117 mPFS: 4.8 vs. 1.2 months mOS: 9.3 vs. 6.3 months (37)
Cheng et al (2018) II Randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled Relapsed small cell lung cancer 120 mPFS: 4.1 vs. 0.7 months mOS: Data not sufficiently mature for analysis (38)
Chi et al (2018) II Multicenter, single-arm sarcoma Refractory metastatic soft tissue 166 mPFS: 5.6 months mOS: 12 months (43)
Sun et al (2018) II Multicenter, single-arm Locally advanced or metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma 58 PFS rate (at 48 weeks): 85.5% PR: 56.90% (54)
Zhou et al (2019) II Centrally randomized, multicenter, sunitinib-controlled Metastatic renal cell carcinoma 133 mPFS: 17.5 vs. 16.6 months mOS: 30.9 vs. 30.5 months (62)
Huang et al (2019) II Randomized, multicenter, double-blind Advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma 164 mPFS: 3.02 vs. 1.41 months mOS: 6.11 vs. 7.20 months DCR: 64.22% vs. 18.18% (63)
Han et al (2018) III Randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm Advanced non-small-cell lung cancer 439 mPFS: 5.4 vs. 1.4 months (65)

DCR, disease control rate; mOS, median overall survival; mPFS, median progression-free survival; MTD, maximum tolerated dose; PR, partial response.