Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 23;198(5):785–792. doi: 10.1007/s00408-020-00381-y

Table 5.

Comparison of patients with an increase in driving pressure with those with a decrease in driving pressure 24 h after initiation of ECMO

Increase in driving pressure Decrease in driving pressure P value
Group A Group B
Number 32 (49%) 33 (51%)
Male sex 23 (72%) 21 (64%) 0.478
Body mass index (Kg/m2) 33 ± 11 29 ± 9.7 0.099
Acute respiratory distress syndrome 19 (59%) 13 (39%) 0.107
Veno-venous ECMO 20 (62%) 9 (27%) 0.004
Ventilator parameters
 PEEP before cannulation (cm H2O) 14 ± 5 9 ± 4  < 0.001
 PEEP 24 h after ECMO (cm H2O) 7 ± 2 7 ± 2 0.262
 Change in PEEP (cm H2O) − 6.4 ± 5 − 2.5 ± 3  < 0.001
 Compliance prior cannulation (mL/cm H2O) 29 ± 11 31 ± 19 0.580
 Compliance 24 h after ECMO (mL/cm H2O) 23 ± 9 32 ± 14 0.002
 Change in compliance (mL/cm H2O) − 7.8 ± 11 0.5 ± 10 0.012
ECMO circuit
 Sweep gas flow after cannulation (L/min) 5.2 ± 2 4.3 ± 1.9 0.090
 ECMO flow after cannulation (L/min) 4.6 ± 0.8 4.5 ± 0.9 0.863
 Respiratory rate after cannulation 11 ± 2 11 ± 3 0.472
 Temperature after cannulation (degree Fahrenheit) 97.6 ± 2.6 98.1 ± 1.2 0.321
Outcomes
 Days on ECMO (days) 13 ± 8 9 ± 5 0.022
 Length of stay after ECMO (days) 30 ± 19 37 ± 37 0.528
 Died on ECMO 10 (31%) 10 (30%) 0.958
 30-day mortality 13 (42%) 11 (34%) 0.537
Discharge disposition
 Home 2 (6.4) 3 (9.4)
 Long-term acute care facility 2 (6.4) 3 (9.4)
 Rehabilitation facility 13 (42) 11 (34.4)

Data are presented mean ± std. or number (percentage)

PEEP positive end expiratory pressure; ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation