Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 23;111:154319. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2020.154319

Table 2.

Pearson's correlation matrix between investigated continuous variables.

VAT TAT SAT LSS EFT§ CRP LDH D-Dimer Temperature Lymphocytes§
Age 0.094 0.032 −0.040 0.285⁎⁎ 0.260⁎⁎ 0.195 0.069 0.225⁎⁎ −0.169 −0.020
VAT 0.827⁎⁎ 0.379⁎⁎ 0.241⁎⁎ 0.183 0.243⁎⁎ 0.247⁎⁎ 0.130 0.167 0.051
TAT 0.833⁎⁎ 0.237⁎⁎ 0.263⁎⁎ 0.209 0.271⁎⁎ 0.209 0.150 0.100
SAT 0.153 0.253⁎⁎ 0.105 0.200 0.213 0.083 0.114
LSS 0.145 0.509⁎⁎ 0.593⁎⁎ 0.181 0.055 −0.136
EFT§ −0.040 0.143 0.188 −0.133 0.108
CRP 0.409⁎⁎ 0.141 0.084 −0.118
LDH 0.233⁎⁎ 0.106 −0.184
D-Dimer 0.067 −0.016
Temperature 0.031

Correlations are reported as Pearson correlation coefficient. p < 0.05 are highlighted in bold. TAT, Total Fat Area; VAT, Visceral Fat Area; SAT, Subcutaneous Fat Area; EFT, Epicardial Fat Thickness; LSS, Lung Severity Score. CRP, C Reactive Protein; LDH, Lactate Dehydrogenase.

§

Denotes a Ln transformed variable to achieve normal distribution (Lymphocytes and EFT: Mean ± SD = 0.0316 ± 0.2229; 1.8605±0.41905, respectively).

p < 0.05.

⁎⁎

p < 0.01.