Table 4.
An evaluation of some related ontologies used in similar CBR studies in comparison with the proposed ontology as shown in Fig. 8, Fig. 9.
| Metrics |
Ontology Metrics |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complexity |
Abstraction | Cohesion | Conceptualization richness |
Comprehension |
|||||
| Studies (Year) [Ref] | Class | Properties | Semantic | Data property | Inheritance | Classes (%) | Property (%) | ||
| Proposed framework | 4 | 11 | 4 | 181 | 1.041 | 0.12 | 8.2 | 10 | 10 |
| El-Sappagh et al. [42] | 5 | 1.4 | 2 | 63 | 0.495 | 2.26 | 5.0 | 88.71 | 2.04% |
| Heras et al. [43] | 3 | 1.3 | 2 | 27 | 0.62 | 0.92 | 2.875 | 0.0 | 0.0 |