Table 7.
A summary of some case-based reasoning (CBR) models and framework, and their domains of application, approaches/techniques used, description of approach and accuracy of the systems.
Studies [Ref] | Year | Approach used for reasoning or diagnoses | Domain of Application | Accuracy (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Proposed framework | 2020 | CBR and NLP, and Semantic Web | Detection and diagnosis of COVID-19 (Novel Coronavirus) | 94.54 |
Rahim et al. [44] | 2019 | Traditional CBR | Diagnosis of psychological disorders | – |
Zhong et al. [45] | 2018 | Text-CBR and ontology | Non-medical: Fault diagnosis and predication by cloud computing | – |
Zhang et al. [46] | 2017 | Traditional CBR | Non-medical: Theory of inventive problem solving for inventive design | – |
El-Sappagh et al. [42] | 2015 | Fuzzy-CBR, and Ontologies | Diabetics | 97.67 |
Shen et al. [47] | 2015 | CBR with ontology approach | Diagnosis of gastric cancer | – |
Heras et al. [43] | 2013 | CBR with ontology approach | Non-medical: multi-agent systems | – |
Li and Ho [48] | 2009 | CBR and fuzzy logic | Non-medical: Prediction of financial activity | 92.36 |
Petrovic et al. [49] | 2011 | Traditional CBR | Radiotherapy planning | 84.72 |
Fan et al. [50] | 2009 | CBR, Fuzzy decision tree | Medical data classification: breast cancer and liver disorders | 98.40 and 81.60 |
Begum et al. [51] | 2009 | CBR and fuzzy logic | Medical data for diagnosis of stress | 90.00 |