Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 15;11:686. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00686

Table 2.

PHQ-9 score and screen-detected positive depression among 932 Chinese healthcare workers during COVID-19.

Guangdong
(n=510)
Hubei
(n=146)
Hong Kong
(n=276)
PHQ-9 score
 Mean (SD) 4.6 (4.8) 5.4 (4.6) 10.5 (6.4)
  Effect size# 1.09 0.86 Reference
  p-value <0.001 <0.001
 Adjusted* mean (95% CI) 4.9 (4.2-5.5) 5.7 (4.5-6.9) 7.5 (6.6-8.5)
  Difference; mean   (95% CI) 2.7 (1.3-4.0) 1.8 (0.2-3.5) Reference
  p-value <0.001 0.029
PHQ-9 positive (score ≥9)
 n 66 22 139
 Prevalence; % (95% CI) 12.9 (10.3-16.2) 15.1 (10.1-21.9) 50.4 (44.5-56.2)
  Effect size^ 0.41 0.35 Reference
  p-value <0.001 <0.001
 Adjusted* prevalence; %  (95% CI) 15.9 (12.0-19.9) 16.5 (8.0-25.0) 30.0 (21.1-38.9)
  Difference; % (95% CI) 14.1 (0.4-24.5) 13.5 (-0.01-27.1) Reference
  p-value 0.008 0.051
Moderately severe/severe depression (score ≥15)
 n 23 7 74
 Prevalence; % 4.5 (3.0-6.7) 4.8 (2.3-9.7) 26.8 (21.9-32.4)
  Effect size^ 0.32 0.27
  p-value <0.001 <0.001
Adjusted* prevalence; % (95% CI) 5.7 (3.1-8.3) 4.8 (-0.1-9.7) 8.0 (3.3-12.7)
 Difference; % (95% CI) 3.2 (-3.7-10.2) 2.3 (-3.0-7.6) Reference
 p-value 0.402 0.364

*Adjusted for sex, educational level, marital status, location, profession, ward/unit, work experience, close contact with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 cases, personal protective equipment provision, infection control training, and presence of COVID-19-like symptoms.

#Cohen’s d.

^Cohen’s w.