Table 3:
The protocol for improving food and nutrition literacy (FNLIT) of Children aged 10-12 years based on the IM model. [The study framework derived from (Creswell et al., 2011)(44)].
| Phase | Procedure | Product |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 (Step1 of the IM model) | ||
| Sub-study 1 (Adapting the questionnaire) | Test-Retest + CVR & CVI + Cronbach’s Alpha | Native Questionnaire |
![]() |
||
| Sub-study 2 (Check existing status using a cross-sectional survey) | Descriptive cross-sectional study) (n=384) + SPSS Software | Descriptive and Analytic Statistics Regression |
![]() |
||
| Sub-study 3 (Qualitative Study) | - Individual in-depth Interviews - Content Analysis |
Text data (Extract barriers and facilitators for improving food and nutrition literacy) |
![]() |
||
| Phase 2 | ||
| Integration of Quantitative and Qualitative Findings | Interpreting and explaining the results of quantitative and qualitative studies | Designing interventions based on native cultural, social and economic considerations |
![]() |
||
| Design steps 2-6 of the Intervention Mapping Model based on Phase 1 and 2 findings | - Draw a matrix of change goals - Methods determination based on the theory - Design and select the content of the program - Design adoption and implementation - Design program evaluation |
Map of the Implementation of the Interventional Study |
![]() |
||
| Phase 3 | ||
| Sub-study 4 (Interventional study) = (Execution of the designed steps - 2-6 of the IM Model) |
- Identification of intervention and control groups - Pre-test in intervention and control groups - Educational and skillful interventions in intervention group based on the steps of the IM model - Post-test in intervention and control groups |
Comparison of intervention and control groups based on nutrition and nutrition literacy and nutritional behaviors in both pre- and post-intervention modes. |




