Table 4.
Cluster analysis of HIV gag tree in Figure 4 showing distribution of sequences among FSU countries.
| Cluster | Number of sequences | Number of countries | Countries | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 10 | 1 | Latvia | 2001–2005 |
| B | 13 | 3 | Russia, Latvia, Ukraine | 2000–2003 |
| C | 9 | 4 | Russia, Latvia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan | 2002–2005 |
| D | 7 | 3 | Russia, Latvia, Ukraine | 2001–2011 |
| E | 6 | 4 | Russia, Latvia, Ukraine, Belarus | 1997–2005 |
| F | 17 | 1 | Latvia | 1998–2002 |
| G | 33 | 4 | Russia, Latvia, Ukraine, Belarus | 1997–2006 |
| H | 13 | 1 | Latvia | 2001–2003 |
| I | 12 | 2 | Latvia, Russia | 2001–2005 |
| J | 20 | 3 | Russia, Latvia, Ukraine | 1998–2008 |
| K | 31 | 1 | Latvia | 2001–2005 |
| L | 7 | 3 | Russia, Kazakhstan, Latvia | 2002–2006 |