Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 11;2020:6320514. doi: 10.1155/2020/6320514

Table 6.

Outcomes of RCTs that evaluated FGF safety and effectiveness.

Ref Type of growth factor Wound closure Time to heal Mechanism mentioned as complete healing Confounders Further outcomes
Granulation tissue Reepithelialization Sex Baseline HbA1c Wound size Offloading Recurrence rate Amputation rate
[21] rhaFGF and rhbFGF Healing in rhbFGF by 6-week treatment. No significant difference between the healing potential of bFGF and aFGF 42 days to complete healing in almost 50% of cases NM NM NM NM NM NM NM NM
[22] Liquid aFGF and EGF Healing in shorter period in the combination group (p < 0.01) and in EGF-treated group (p < 0.05) compared with the control group 36-47 days in combination-treated group versus control Y Y NM NM NM NM NM NM
[23] Liquid bFGF No significant difference Mean healing time: 9.3 weeks for the bFGF and 5.8 weeks for the control group NM NM NM NM NM NM NM NM
[24] bFGF The area of ulcer decreased by 57.5%, 72.3%, and 82.2% in the placebo, 0.001% in the bFGF, and 0.01% in the bFGF groups, respectively, and differences were significant between the 0.01% bFGF and placebo groups (p = 0.025) NM Y Y NM NM NM NM Approximately 10% in all groups NM

FGF: fibroblast growth factor; Y: yes; N: no; NM: not mentioned.