Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 23;3(7):e207401. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.7401

Table 5. Summary of 17 APM Implementation Findings Based on Outcomes Examined.

APM implementation LAN category Outcome category Source
Statistically significant evidence for outcome or significant difference for at least 1 measured outcome Nonstatistically significant difference, minimal significant difference, or no statistical test provided
Sustaining Healthcare Across Integrated Primary Care Efforts Program 2A Processes of care Ross et al,39 2019 NA
Spending NA Ross et al,39 2019
Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach 2C Processes of care Garner et al,40 2011; Garner et al,41 2012; Lee et al,43 2012; Garner et al,42 2018 NA
Clinical outcomes Garner et al,42 2018 Garner et al,41 2012
Spending Garner et al,42 2018 NA
Spectrum Addiction Services 2C Processes of care Shepard et al,44 2006a NA
Outpatient psychosocial counseling treatment center in Maryland 2C Processes of care Vandrey et al,45 2011a NA
Utilization Vandrey et al,45 2011a NA
Patient dumping, gaming, or adverse selection NA Vandrey et al,45 2011a
Washington State Mental Health Integration Program 2C Processes of care Bao et al,47 2017; Unutzer et al,46 2012 NA
Clinical outcomes Unützer et al,46 2012 NA
Patient dumping, gaming, or adverse selection Unützer et al,46 2012 NA
Connecticut’s Behavioral Health Partnership 2C Processes of care Schmutte et al,48 2019a NA
Medicare Shared Savings Program Accountable Care Organizationsb 3A Processes of care Busch et al,36 2016; Busch et al,37 2017 NA
Clinical outcomes NA Busch et al,36 2016
Spending NA Busch et al,36 2016
Utilization NA Busch et al,36 2016
Patient dumping, gaming, or adverse selection Busch et al,36 2016 NA
Maine Medicaid Accountable Communities Initiativec 3A Processes of care NA Beil et al,38 2019
Spending NA Beil et al,38 2019
Utilization NA Beil et al,38 2019
Vermont Medicaid Shared Savings Programc 3A Processes of care NA Beil et al,38 2019
Spending Beil et al,38 2019 NA
Utilization Beil et al,38 2019 NA
Medicare Pioneer Accountable Care Organizationsb 3B Processes of care Busch et al,37 2017 Busch et al,36 2016
Clinical outcomes NA Busch et al,36 2016
Spending Busch et al,36 2016 NA
Utilization NA Busch et al,36 2016
Patient dumping, gaming, or adverse selection Busch et al,36 2016 NA
Minnesota Integrated Health Partnerships Programc 3B Processes of care Beil et al,38 2019 NA
Spending NA Beil et al,38 2019
Utilization Beil et al,38 2019 NA
Delaware Division of Substance Abuse and Mental Health–Outpatient Services APM 4A Processes of care Stewart et al,49 2013 McLellan et al,50 2008a
Utilization NA McLellan et al,50 2008a
Patient dumping, gaming, of adverse selection NA McLellan et al,50 2008a; Stewart et al,49 2013
Delaware Division of Substance Abuse and Mental Health–Detoxification Care Transition APM 4A Utilization NA Haley et al,51 2011a
Patient dumping, gaming, or adverse selection Haley et al,51 2011a NA
Maine Addiction Treatment System, phase 1 of performance-based contracting 4A Clinical outcomes Commons et al,52 1997a NA
Utilization Commons et al,52 1997a NA
Patient dumping, gaming, or adverse selection Shen,56 2003; Lu et al54 2003; Lu,53 1999a; Lu and Ma,55 2006 NA
Maine Addiction Treatment System, phase 2 of performance-based contracting 4A Processes of care NA Brucker and Stewart,57 2011a; Stewart et al,58 2018
Utilization NA Brucker and Stewart,57 2011a
Patient dumping, gaming, or adverse selection NA Stewart et al,58 2018
BCBSMA Alternative Quality Contract 4B Processes of care Barry et al,59 2015; Stuart et al,60 2017 NA
Spending Barry et al,59 2015 Stuart et al,60 2017; Donohue et al,61 2018
Utilization Barry et al,59 2015; Stuart et al,60 2017 Donohue et al,61 2018
Oregon Coordinated Care Organizations 4B Processes of care NA Rieckmann et al,62 2018c

Abbreviations: APM, alternative payment model; BCBSMA, Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Massachusetts; LAN, Learning and Action Network; NA, not applicable.

a

Publication had a quality rating of 3B or 3C according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence modified for this investigation (Table 2).

b

Busch et al36 and Busch et al37 were counted twice (in LAN 3A and 3B) because both study publications describe APMs in the 2 categories.

c

Beil et al38 was counted 3 times (in LAN 3A and 3B) because it describes and analyzes 3 different APM implementations.