Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 22;57:102834. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102834

Fig. 1.

Fig 1

Salivary Lf levels by clinical diagnosis and amyloid-PET biomarker profile. Box and whisker plots showing salivary Lf levels across diagnostic groups within (a) cohort 1, and (b) cohort 2. Boxes represent the 25th, 50th and 75th data percentiles. Whiskers represent the lowest and highest data. Scatter plots showing salivary Lf levels in (c) all subjects grouped as negative (n = 165) and positive (n = 85) amyloid-PET biomarker profile (excluding the control-PET+ subjects), and (d) in patients (excluding healthy asymptomatic controls) grouped as negative (n = 47) and positive (n = 85) amyloid-PET biomarker profile. Differences between groups were assessed using Kruskal-Wallis test or one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni and Student's t-test. *p < 0•05; ****p < 0•0001. Lf, lactoferrin; MCI, Mild cognitive impairment; AD, Alzheimer´s disease dementia; FTD, frontotemporal dementia; PET+, positive amyloid-PET scan; PET, negative amyloid-PET scan.