Skip to main content
. 2020 May 28;34(4):1488–1495. doi: 10.1111/jvim.15811

TABLE 3.

Relevant results of multivariable models (model‐adjusted means, 95% CIs, and P values) testing 2‐way interactions between BPP method of measurement, body weight, operator, and day of measurement, against mean volume of urine recorded

Variable Mean Mean 95% CI P value
Method of measurement × Body weight
Method of measurement .002*
Child 37.4 25.1‐55.6
Man 40.1 26.9‐59.6
Actual 44.9 30.1‐67.1
Body weight (kg) .02*
≤5.5 19.6 8.9‐43.4
5.6‐11.94 25.2 11.5‐55.7
11.95‐24.9 110.0 46.1‐262.4
≥25 50.3 25.3‐100.3
Two‐way pairs (setting—kg) .001*
Child: ≤5.5 17.4 7.8‐38.6
Child: 5.6‐11.94 21.0 9.4‐46.5
Child: 11.95‐24.9 117.1 48.9‐280.4
Child: ≥25 45.7 22.8‐91.4
Man: ≤5.5 17.5 7.9‐38.8
Man: 5.6‐11.94 25.6 11.5‐56.8
Man: 11.95‐24.9 118.4 49.4‐282.6
Man: ≥25 48.8 24.4‐97.7
Actual: ≤ 5.5 24.9 11.1‐55.9
Actual: 5.6‐11.94 29.7 13.3‐66.7
Actual: 11.95‐24.9 95.9 39.6‐232.3
Actual: ≥25 57.2 28.3‐115.5
Operator × Method of measurement .23
Operator × Day .64
Operator × Body weight .46
Method of measurement × Day .29
Significant contrasts for Method of measurement × Body weight interaction
Weight (kg) Relevant contrasts Difference P value
Setting × Weight
≤5.50 Actual versus child 7.5 .02*
Actual versus man 7.4 .02*
≤ 5.50 Child versus man −0.1 1.00
5.60‐11.94 Actual versus child 8.7 .03*
Actual versus man 4.1 .92
5.60‐11.94 Child versus man −4.6 .32
11.95‐24.9 Actual versus child −21.2 .81
Actual versus man −22.5 .71
11.95‐24.9 Child versus man −1.3 1.00
≥25.0 Actual versus child 11.5 .41
Actual versus man 8.4 .84
≥25.0 Child versus man −3.1 .99

Note: Relevant contrasts of method of measurement by body weight (kg) (the significant predictors) are appended.

Abbreviation: BPP, BladderScan Prime Plus; CI, confidence interval.