TABLE 5.

Spearman rho non-parametric correlations between Week 2 lucid dreaming rates and variables that operationalize the way in which the lucid dream induction techniques were practiced.

	M (SD)	Correlation (rs) with L DRF lucid
L Reality tests (Groups 2 and 3)	4.1 (4.4)	–0.04
L MILD phrase repetitions (Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4)	13.6 (11.6)	–0.02
L Fast cycles (Group 5 only)	4.0 (2.2)	−0.11*
L Slow cycles (Group 5 only)	5.1 (4.1)	0.08
L Hybrid technique cycles (Group 6 only)	5.1 (2.9)	0.01
L Technique min (all groups)	8.7 (9.2)	–0.02
L Min back to sleep (all groups)	19.5 (52.0)	–0.05

L, logbook variable. Group 1 = MILD + WBTB (no RT), Group 2 = MILD + WBTB + RT Breath, Group 3 = MILD + WBTB + RT Hands, Group 4 = MILD + WBTB (no RT), Group 5 = SSILD + WBTB (no RT), Group 6 = SSILD/MILD Hybrid + WBTB. All correlations are point-biserial and based on daily observations. *p = 0.05.