TABLE 3.
BPD | |||||
16.85 (1.87, 152.08) | LAGB | ||||
7.93 (1.18, 53.28) | 0.47 (0.08, 2.68) | LSG | |||
5.10 (0.90, 28.75) | 0.30 (0.06, 1.44) | 0.64 (0.28, 1.46) | RYGBP | ||
1.56 (0.13, 19.32) | 0.09 (0.01, 1.01) | 0.20 (0.04, 1.02) | 0.31 (0.05, 1.92) | Mini‐GBP | |
54.12 (7.57, 387.05) | 3.21(0.78, 13.15) | 6.83 (1.47, 31.75) | 10.62 (2.76, 40.89) | 34.77 (3.65, 330.73) | NST |
Note: Comparisons between drugs should be read from left to right. The estimates are located at the crossing between the column‐defining treatment and row‐defining treatment. An OR lower than 1 favours the column‐defining treatment. The significant results are presented in bold.
Abbreviations: BPD, biliopancreatic diversion without duodenal switch; CrI, credible interval; LAGB, laparoscopic‐adjustable gastric banding; LSG, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy; RYGBP, Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass; mini‐GBP, single anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass; NST, non‐surgical treatment; OR, odds ratio.