Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 30;44(2):131–137. doi: 10.1111/coa.13239

Table 2.

Summary of study findings

Author, year Total, n pT1 pT2 pT3 pT4 Local recurrence in PNI+ patients Local recurrence in PNI− patients HR P‐value
PNI+ (n) LR (n) LR (%) PNI− (n) LR (n) LR (%)
Tai, 2011 307 146 161 84 16 19.0% 223 30 13.5% 0.221
Ganly, 2012 164 76 88 22b 1 4.5% 124b 13 10.5% 0.56
Chen, 2013 442 272 170 65 12 18.5%c 377 55 14.6% NS
Chatzistefanou, 2014 78 50a 28a 26.3%d 27.5%d 0.332
Aivazian, 2015 318 108 106 26 76 1.26e 1.00
Matsushita, 2015 89 82a 7a 23% 26% NS
Low, 2016 121 121 24 5 20.8% 65 6 9.2% 0.33

HR, hazard ratio; LR, local recurrence; n, number; NS, not significant; PNI−, perineural invasion‐negative; PNI+, perineural invasion‐positive.

a

These numbers represent T1 and T2 or T3 and T4 cases.

b

There were also a number of patients in which PNI was not reported.

c

PNI and lymphovascular invasion were combined as a high risk group in the calculations of local recurrence.

d

Local recurrence rates were calculated in patients who did not receive postoperative radiotherapy.

e

Hazard ratios were 0.42 (P = 0.247) and 2.24 (P = 0.049) for unifocal and multifocal, respectively.