Table 2.
ANOVA style contrast table of outcome variables with degrees of freedom estimated from Kenward–Roger approximations
| d′ | Omissions (%) | RT (log) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F (df) | p | F (df) | p | F (df) | p | |
| Sleep | 7.85 (1, 56) | 0.007 | 8.00 (1, 56) | 0.006 | 0.28 (1, 56.6) | 0.601 |
| Load | 116.02 (1, 56) | <0.001 | 0.59 (1, 56) | 0.445 | 278.02 (1, 58.5) | <0.001 |
| Valence | 2.24 (2, 112) | 0.112 | 0.08 (2, 112) | 0.924 | 6.35 (2, 96) | 0.003 |
| Sleep × load | 0.83 (1, 56) | 0.367 | 0.12 (1, 56) | 0.732 | 2.54 (1, 58.4) | 0.116 |
| Sleep × valence | 1.6 (2, 112) | 0.206 | 0.39 (2, 112) | 0.681 | 5.55 (2, 3,916.3) | 0.004 |
| Load × valence | 1.37 (2, 112) | 0.259 | 0.7 (2, 112) | 0.498 | 3.53 (2, 3,954) | 0.029 |
| Sleep × load × valence | 0.06 (2, 112) | 0.946 | 0.34 (2, 112) | 0.713 | 0.25 (2, 3,928.3) | 0.781 |
RT: reaction time.
The number of observations is larger for RT as it was calculated using a mixed model design without aggregated means. Significant effects are marked in bold font.