Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 11;26(3):337–349. doi: 10.1111/jvh.13038

Table 4.

Patients with virologic failure: polymorphisms/substitutions in NS3 and NS5A at baseline and time of failure

Treatment historya Treatment duration (weeks) HCV subtype Cirrhosis Y/N Reason for nonresponse NS3 variants NS5A variants
Baseline At failure Baseline At failure
SURVEYOR‐2
1b Experienced 12 3a N Relapse None Y56H + Q168R A30K A30K + Y93H
2 Experienced 12 3a N Breakthrough A166S Y56H + A166S + Q168L A30K A30K + Y93H
3 Experienced 12 3a N Relapse None None Y93H L31F + Y93H
4 Experienced 16 3a Y Relapse A166S None None M28G
5 Experienced 12 3a N Relapse None None A30K A30K + Y93H
6 Experienced 12 3a N Relapse None None Y93H Y93H
7 Experienced 16 3a N Relapse None Y56H + Q168R A30K A30K + Y93H
8 Experienceda 16 3a Y Relapse None None None L31F + Y93H
9b Experienced 16 3a Y Breakthrough A166S A156G + A166S None A30K + Y93H
ENDURANCE‐3
10 Naïve 12 3a N Breakthrough Q168R Y56H + Q168R A30V/K, Y93H A30K + Y93H
11 Naïve 12 3a N Relapse None None None A30G, Y93H
12b Naïve 12 3a N Relapse None Reinfectionc None Reinfectionb
13 Naïve 12 3b N Relapse None Q80K V31M V31M + Y93H
14 Naïve 8 3a N Relapse T54S T54S None None
15 Naïve 8 3a N Relapse None Q168L A30K A30K + Y93H
16 Naïve 8 3a N Relapse A166S Y56H, Q168L A30K A30K + Y93H
17b Naïve 8 3a N Failed to Suppress A166S, Q168R Q80R, A156G A30K A30K + Y93H
18 Naïve 8 3a N Relapse A166S A166S None Y93H
19 Naïve 8 3a N Relapse None Y56H A30K A30K + Y93H
MAGELLAN‐2
20 Naïve 12 3a N Relapse None Y56H Y93H Y93H
EXPEDITION‐2
21b Naïve 12 3a Y Breakthrough None Y56H A30V S24F + M28K

Detection of baseline polymorphisms and treatment‐emergent substitutions was done with next‐generation sequencing using a 15% detection threshold relative to subtype‐specific reference sequence. For samples with multiple variants (polymorphisms/substitutions) within a target, if individual variants were detected at ≥90% prevalence, they are considered to be linked and denoted by “+”, whereas if one or more of the variants was detected at <90% prevalence, the variants are separated by a comma. Amino acid positions included in the analysis: 36, 43, 54, 55, 56, 80, 155, 156, 166 and 168 in NS3; 24, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 58, 92 and 93 in NS5A.

a

All patients listed with treatment experience were experienced with pegIFN/RBV, except for patient #8, who was experienced with SOF/RBV.

b

Nonadherent to DAA and excluded from mITT analysis (as virologic failure unrelated to efficacy); additional details in Table S2.

c

Patient was infected with a GT3a virus at the time of virologic failure with viral sequences that were distinct from the sequences present at baseline and was determined to have been HCV reinfected.