Table 4.
Treatment historya | Treatment duration (weeks) | HCV subtype | Cirrhosis Y/N | Reason for nonresponse | NS3 variants | NS5A variants | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | At failure | Baseline | At failure | ||||||
SURVEYOR‐2 | |||||||||
1b | Experienced | 12 | 3a | N | Relapse | None | Y56H + Q168R | A30K | A30K + Y93H |
2 | Experienced | 12 | 3a | N | Breakthrough | A166S | Y56H + A166S + Q168L | A30K | A30K + Y93H |
3 | Experienced | 12 | 3a | N | Relapse | None | None | Y93H | L31F + Y93H |
4 | Experienced | 16 | 3a | Y | Relapse | A166S | None | None | M28G |
5 | Experienced | 12 | 3a | N | Relapse | None | None | A30K | A30K + Y93H |
6 | Experienced | 12 | 3a | N | Relapse | None | None | Y93H | Y93H |
7 | Experienced | 16 | 3a | N | Relapse | None | Y56H + Q168R | A30K | A30K + Y93H |
8 | Experienceda | 16 | 3a | Y | Relapse | None | None | None | L31F + Y93H |
9b | Experienced | 16 | 3a | Y | Breakthrough | A166S | A156G + A166S | None | A30K + Y93H |
ENDURANCE‐3 | |||||||||
10 | Naïve | 12 | 3a | N | Breakthrough | Q168R | Y56H + Q168R | A30V/K, Y93H | A30K + Y93H |
11 | Naïve | 12 | 3a | N | Relapse | None | None | None | A30G, Y93H |
12b | Naïve | 12 | 3a | N | Relapse | None | Reinfectionc | None | Reinfectionb |
13 | Naïve | 12 | 3b | N | Relapse | None | Q80K | V31M | V31M + Y93H |
14 | Naïve | 8 | 3a | N | Relapse | T54S | T54S | None | None |
15 | Naïve | 8 | 3a | N | Relapse | None | Q168L | A30K | A30K + Y93H |
16 | Naïve | 8 | 3a | N | Relapse | A166S | Y56H, Q168L | A30K | A30K + Y93H |
17b | Naïve | 8 | 3a | N | Failed to Suppress | A166S, Q168R | Q80R, A156G | A30K | A30K + Y93H |
18 | Naïve | 8 | 3a | N | Relapse | A166S | A166S | None | Y93H |
19 | Naïve | 8 | 3a | N | Relapse | None | Y56H | A30K | A30K + Y93H |
MAGELLAN‐2 | |||||||||
20 | Naïve | 12 | 3a | N | Relapse | None | Y56H | Y93H | Y93H |
EXPEDITION‐2 | |||||||||
21b | Naïve | 12 | 3a | Y | Breakthrough | None | Y56H | A30V | S24F + M28K |
Detection of baseline polymorphisms and treatment‐emergent substitutions was done with next‐generation sequencing using a 15% detection threshold relative to subtype‐specific reference sequence. For samples with multiple variants (polymorphisms/substitutions) within a target, if individual variants were detected at ≥90% prevalence, they are considered to be linked and denoted by “+”, whereas if one or more of the variants was detected at <90% prevalence, the variants are separated by a comma. Amino acid positions included in the analysis: 36, 43, 54, 55, 56, 80, 155, 156, 166 and 168 in NS3; 24, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 58, 92 and 93 in NS5A.
All patients listed with treatment experience were experienced with pegIFN/RBV, except for patient #8, who was experienced with SOF/RBV.
Nonadherent to DAA and excluded from mITT analysis (as virologic failure unrelated to efficacy); additional details in Table S2.
Patient was infected with a GT3a virus at the time of virologic failure with viral sequences that were distinct from the sequences present at baseline and was determined to have been HCV reinfected.