Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 24;5:9. doi: 10.1186/s41073-020-00096-x

Table 1.

Percent of reviewer comment sets containing unprofessional comments or incomplete, inaccurate or unsubstantiated critiques (IIUC), divided by subject matter and by case studies (CS)

Topic Survey Question Overall Ecology and Evolution Behavioral Medicine
Total Subject Total CS1 CS2 CS3 CS4 Publons Subject Total CS5 CS6 Publons
Unprofessional Comments Demeaned or Attacked the Author 12 18 35 18 9 15 10 7 4 6 7
Accusation of Questionable Research Practices 2 3 2 8 2 3 4 2 2 3 2
IIUC Superficial Review 19 20 24 18 17 21 19 18 1 13 22
Inaccurate Statement About Clearly Stated Information in Draft 22 32 52 8 9 10 8 0 13
Arguments from Authority 27 36 56 34 40 33 25 20 12 31 19
Unaware of, or Criticizing Common Techniques that Are Supported by the Preponderance of Evidence 14 21 43 24 17 11 11 8 0 16 7
Claims of Missing Literature with no Citations or Direction offered. 19 27 54 18 21 23 14 12 10 10 13
1491RCS 666RCS 181RCS 38RCS 47RCS 80RCS 320RCS 825RCS 90RCS 135 RCS 600RCS
568MS 290MS 29MS 10MS 17MS 34MS 201MS 278MS 26MS 50MS 202MS

RCS Reviewer comment set, MS Manuscript