Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 26;144(1):27–36. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12692

Table 2.

Univariable analysis of the treatment of women with severe hypertensive disorders during childbirth, comparison of relative risk of outcomes during the ninth to 12th months of the intervention (October 1, 2015, to January 31, 2016) compared with during the baseline period (October 1, 2014, to January 31, 2015).a

Characteristic At baseline (n=188) At 9–12 intervention months (n=196) P value RR (95% CI)
Antihypertensive treatment
All women with severe hypertensionb 184 193
Hydralazine or nifedipine administered 86 (46.7) 124 (64.2) 1.37 (1.14–1.66)
Anticonvulsant treatment
Women with urine protein ≥2 or eclampsiac 121 144
MgSO4 treatment initiated 110 (90.9) 127 (88.2) 0.97 (0.89–1.05)
Women receiving MgSO4 110 127
Patellar reflexes and respiratory rate at least once 20 (18.2) 44 (34.6) 1.91 (1.20–3.03)
Labor progression
All women with the required date and time recorded: 173 189
Time from inclusion criteria recorded till delivery, min 390 (161–790) 457 (225–745) 0.356d
All study women 188 196
Partograph action line crossed (prolonged first stage) 22 (11.7) 22 (11.2) 0.96 (0.55–1.67)
Induction of labore 48 (25.5) 75 (38.3) 1.50 (1.11–2.03)
Oxytocin for augmentation in active phase of laborf 45 (23.9) 36 (18.4) 0.77 (0.52–1.13)

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; MgSO4, magnesium sulfate; RR, relative risk.

a

Values are given as absolute number, number (percentage), or median (interquartile range), unless indicated otherwise.

b

Diagnostic criteria for severe hypertension applied: systolic BP ≥160 mm Hg and/or diastolic BP ≥110 mm Hg.

c

Diagnostic criteria for severe pre‐eclampsia/eclampsia applied: severe hypertension on at least one reading and urine protein ≥2, or eclampsia/convulsions described (owing to poor data quality, women without severe hypertension or eclampsia, but fulfilling the WHO criteria of severe pre‐eclampsia due to symptoms of organ failure could not be identified). For an additional 28/188 (15%) women at baseline and 12/193 (6%) during the intervention, urine dipstick was not performed.

d

Mann‐Whitney test for difference.

e

One woman was induced by balloon catheter; all others were induced by misoprostol with or without subsequent oxytocin.

f

Women were excluded if induced. For 11/45 (24%) and 7/36 (19%), respectively, membranes were still intact when starting oxytocin augmentation (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.34–1.84).