Table 1.
Study | Design | Setting | Participants | Measures | Findings regarding enablers |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chase et al., 2013 | Quantitative ‐ Cross‐sectional Survey | Eastern Nepal (Refugee camps) |
n = 193 Age: 18–59 (83%) 60+ (16%) M = 46%; F = 54% Bhutanese. Buddhist 26%, Hindu 50%, Kirat 14%, Christian 7% Random sampling |
Brief COPE‐ modified version. |
The five factor solution (highly related coping strategies):
|
Emmelkamp et al., 2002 | Quantitative ‐ Cross‐sectional Survey |
Nepal2 (Refugee camps) 1997 |
n = 315 Mean age = 44 years. M = 84% F = 16% Bhutanese. Random sampling |
|
Increases in received social support (but not perceived social support) were associated with reduction of depressive symptoms. |
Nakash et al., 2017 |
Quantitative ‐ Cross‐sectional Survey |
Tel‐Aviv, Israel (Community) April 2012–June 2013 |
n = 90 M = 100% (male only sample) Age 19–48 Median age = 32 Eritrean and Sudanese. Convenience sampling |
|
|
Segal et al., 2018 | Quantitative ‐ Cross‐sectional Survey via interview |
Lebanon (Shatila Refugee Camp) June 2012 ‐ June 2013 |
n = 254 M = 101 F = 107 63.4% Palestinian 18.5% Syrian 18.1% non‐refugee3 People lived in camp for average 21.1 years (±17) Convenience sampling |
The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6) |
|
Study | Design | Setting | Participants | Interview or FG Focus | Findings regarding enablers |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Akinyemi et al., 2016 | Qualitative FG |
Ogun State, Nigeria (Oru Refugee Camp) 2010 |
n = 32 (4 FGs) M = 16 F = 16 Age 18–67; Mean age = 40.2 (±13.4). Liberian and Sierra Leonean. Purposive sampling |
|
|
Chase & Sapkota, 2017 |
Qualitative Interview and FG |
Eastern Nepal (Refugee camp) August 2011 –June 2012 |
n = 40 for interviews n = 40 for FGs (4 FG approx. 10 in each)4 Age 18+ Bhutanese. Purposive sampling of community leaders and random sampling of other participants. |
|
|
Chemali et al., 2017 |
Qualitative Interview |
Lebanon (Refugee camps in El‐Marj and Bar Elias) December 2015 |
n = 66 Age 65+ (average age was 65.88, ±7.26 years) M = 27 (40.9%) F = 39 (59.1%) Syrian. Convenience sample |
|
|
Cohen & Asgary, 2016 | Qualitative FG | Thailand (Community) 2014 |
n = 49 (across 10 FGs) M = 13 F = 36 18+ Karen Burmese. Convenience sampling |
|
|
Elsass & Phuntsok, 2009 | Qualitative Interview | Dharamsala, India (Community) 1998–2000 |
STUDY 1 n = 102 M = 66 F = 36 STUDY 2 n = 32 M = 26 F = 6 Tibetan refugee torture survivors. Convenience sampling |
|
STUDY 1: Most frequent/commonly reported: 1. Political coping, 2. Buddhist coping, 3. Spiritual attitude, 4. Positive thinking 5. Networking, 6. Social support. STUDY 2: a) Generally most helpful: 1. Political coping, 2. Spiritual coping, 3. Buddhist attitude, 4. Positive thinking, 5. Networking, 6. Social support (b) Counselling, most helpful: Buddhist attitude, Positive thinking, Networking, Social support, Psychotherapeutic help. |
Hussain & Bhushan, 2011 | Qualitative interview | Himachal Pradesh, India (Community) |
n = 12 M = 8 F = 4 Age 25–46. Mean age =35 (SD=6.5) Tibetan. Snowball sampling |
Life history, challenging life experiences, how they coped with these challenges, and what Tibetan cultural resources were helpful in dealing with their traumatic experiences. |
Cultural resources:
|
Khawaja et al., 2008 | Qualitative interview |
Brisbane, Australia Retrospective focus of time in transit countries: Egypt (community) & Kenya (camps) |
n = 23 M = 11 F = 12 Age 27–47 Mean age = 35 n = 22 Christian n = 1 Muslim Sudanese. Snowball sampling |
Life in Sudan prior to migration, experience in transit including coping strategies employed (focus of present review data extraction), and life in Australia after migration. |
|
Labys et al., 2017 | Qualitative interview |
Durbin, South Africa (Community) October–December 2014 |
n = 18 M = 9 F = 9 Age 18–58 Mean age = 35.9 Zimbabwean and Congolese from DRC. Random sampling |
Problems, effects of problems, coping strategies and believed causes of problems, daily functioning | Coping strategies: talking with friends and refugee peers, attending church, praying, work, physical activities, interactions with family, and learning to speak Zulu (host country language). ‐Cognitive mechanisms: avoidance of thoughts, going to church, being active and focussing on family. ‐Social support: social contact, improving mood, sharing burdens, generating solutions, and assisting with finances. Connecting with people on social media for ideas about how to cope. ‐Physical activities and language: playing sport, dancing. |
Lavie‐Ajayi & Slonim‐Nevo, 2017 | Qualitative interview | Israel (Holot Detention Center) |
n = 8 M = 100% (male only sample) Age 27–38 Sudanese. Purposive sampling |
Experiences in Sudan and during the journey, experiences in Israel, relationships with Israelis and with Israeli society, relationships with relatives and other refugees, community engagement and support, factors contributing to adaptation and deterioration in their new environment, and perspectives regarding their future. |
|
M uhwezi & Sam, 2004 | Qualitative5 Interview |
Kampala, Uganda (Community) Mean length of time living in Kampala = 47.6 months, (SD = 16.5) |
n = 9 M = 7 F = 2 Mean age=31 (of larger sample) Congolese, Somali, Kenyan, Rwandan. Purposive sampling. |
Friendship networks, financial situation, hospitality of Ugandans, social support, pre‐exile circumstances |
Social support for urban refugees either from fellow refugees, extended families, residential ethnic enclaves, friends or concerned natives seemed to strongly buffer stress and facilitate adaptation. Maintaining cultural identity. ‐Religion‐ provides hope, encourages forgiveness and helps with coping. –Employment. ‐Hospitality from native Ugandans to refugees. Learning the Ugandan language enhanced satisfaction and well‐being. |
Pavlish, 2005 |
Qualitative interview (two part interview) Interpretive narrative approach |
Rwanda (Refugee camp) |
n = 14 F = 100% Age 18–50 Congolese. Purposive sampling |
Interview part 1: Describe memories and anecdotes about significant events and people past and present, stories about their ordinary days. Given the freedom to choose their own topics and anecdotes. Interview part 2: Initial interview topics were reviewed and additional anecdotes about those topics added. Three questions were then asked: (a) Can you describe experiences that make you fearful or feel unsafe? (b) Can you describe experiences when you have been strong? (c) Can you describe what you hope to experience in the future? |
Action Response 1: Refiguration‐ reframing, finding meaning and purpose from adverse experiences, economic activities. Action Response 2: Advocacy‐ agency, leads to hope, change situation. Action Response 3: Resistance‐ with family responsibilities at centre. Action Response 4: Resignation (not an enabler). Action Response 5: Sorrow (not an enabler). Action Response 6: Faith‐prayer, gaining strength and companionship from God. |
Tippens, 2017 | Qualitative interview |
Nairobi, Kenya January–August 2014 (Community) |
n = 55; M = 27 F = 28 Age 17–70. Mean age = 38 Congolese from DRC. Purposive sampling |
|
|
Note. FG: focus group; F: female; M: male; DRC: democratic republic of congo.