Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 21;28(3):533–542. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1056

Table 4.

Effects of the decision aid related to depth of use

T0 (baseline) T1 (immediately after use of the decision aid) T2 (2 weeks after baseline) T0–T1 T0–T2
Means (SD) Means (SD) Means (SD) T p ES T p ES
Decisional conflict (0–100)a
Low engagementb 35.75 (21.12) 27.08 (15.83) 25.57 (16.99) 4.48 <0.001 0.63 3.93 <0.001 0.59
High engagementc 35.55 (16.95) 23.58 (15.85) 27.79 (22.35) 6.58 <0.001 0.96 2.02 0.050 0.32
Knowledge (0–15)
Low engagement 9.22 (2.97) 12.37 (2.03) 11.95 (1.93) −7.59 <0.001 −1.06 −5.64 <0.001 −0.85
High engagement 9.34 (2.64) 14.00 (1.14) 13.39 (1.62) −12.94 <0.001 −1.89 −8.96 <0.001 −1.45
Realistic expectations (0–3)
Low engagement 0.64 (0.76) 1.45 (1.14) 1.08 (1.03) −5.49 <0.001 −0.75 −3.25 0.002 −0.45
High engagement 0.84 (0.65) 2.08 (0.90) 1.24 (0.87) −9.81 <0.001 −1.39 −2.92 0.005 −0.41
Level of deliberation (6–30)
Low engagement 23.63 (4.72) 22.87 (4.33) 23.51 (3.99) 1.13 0.268 0.18 0.20 0.842 0.03
High engagement 22.58 (4.23) 24.78 (2.64) 24.67 (2.72) −3.43 0.002 −0.57 −2.31 0.028 −0.42
Decision self‐efficacy (0–100)
Low engagement 77.68 (13.42) 77.64 (16.85) 77.38 (15.19) 0.02 0.985 0.00 0.04 0.968 0.01
High engagement 76.89 (11.44) 81.19 (14.21) 82.00 (12.96) −2.67 0.010 −0.39 −3.65 0.001 −0.60

Decisional conflict scale excluding effective decision subscale. b≤15 pages. c>15 pages.