TABLE 4.

Summary of the three main sufficient conditions for the intermediate solution for RSES and SWLS.

Frequency cutoff: 1	RSES			∼RSES			SWLS			∼SWLS
	Consistency cutoff: 0.80			Consistency cutoff: 0.88			Consistency cutoff: 0.88			Consistency cutoff: 0.90
	1	2	3	1	2	3	1	2	3	1	2	3
Girl
Older	⚫	⚫	⚫		◯	◯
CE	◯
EE		⚫	⚫			◯		⚫
EA	⚫	⚫	⚫		◯				⚫		⚫
EC	◯	◯	◯	⚫	⚫		⚫		⚫	⚫		◯
ER	◯	◯	◯	⚫		⚫	⚫	⚫	⚫			◯
RSES							◯	◯		⚫	⚫	⚫
Raw coverage	0.27	0.25	0.23	0.42	0.29	0.28	0.48	0.41	0.38	0.52	0.45	0.41
Unique coverage	0.04	0.03	0.01	0.03	0.02	0.00	0.04	0.02	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.00
Consistency	0.81	0.81	0.80	0.89	0.89	0.90	0.84	0.86	0.85	0.89	0.89	0.92
Overall solution consistency			0.73			0.83			0.77			0.86
Overall solution coverage			0.41			0.68			0.70			0.66

⚫, presence of condition; ◯, absence of condition (low levels); ∼, absence of condition (low levels); CE, cognitive empathy; EE, emotional empathy; EA, emotional attention; EC, emotional clarity; ER, emotional repair; RSES, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale; SWLS, Satisfaction With The Life. Expected address vector for RSES: 1,0,1,1,0,1,1 (0: absent; 1: present) using format (Fiss, 2011). Expected address vector for ∼RSES: 1,1,0,0,1,0,0 (0: absent; 1: present). Expected address vector for SWLS: 0,1,1,1,0,1,1,1 (0: absent; 1: present) using format (Fiss, 2011). Expected address vector for ∼SWLS: 1,1,0,0,1,0,0,0 (0: absent; 1: present). Terms/values in bold, type information on the model as a whole considering all the conditions, not only the most important.