TABLE 5.
Regression analysis predicting externalizing problem behavior from consistency and autonomy support profiles.
| Variables | B | SE | 95% CI | t | p | |
| Consistency (CO) | –0.02 | 0.03 | –0.08 | 0.04 | –0.68 | 0.50 |
| HPHT vs. HPLT | 0.16 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.30 | 2.16 | 0.03 |
| LPLT vs. HPHT | 0.21 | 0.04 | 0.12 | 0.29 | 4.90 | <0.001 |
| Age | –0.01 | 0.01 | –0.03 | 0.01 | –1.09 | 0.28 |
| Sex1 | –0.12 | 0.03 | –0.18 | –0.06 | –3.85 | <0.001 |
| SES | –0.01 | 0.01 | –0.02 | 0.00 | –1.32 | 0.19 |
| Degree | 0.04 | 0.03 | –0.02 | 0.10 | 1.23 | 0.22 |
| Duration (years) | –0.01 | 0.01 | –0.02 | 0.01 | –0.98 | 0.33 |
| Social desirability | –0.16 | 0.05 | –0.25 | –0.07 | –3.45 | <0.001 |
| Perseverance | –0.10 | 0.02 | –0.14 | –0.07 | –5.54 | <0.001 |
| CO × HPHT vs. HPLT | 0.17 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.32 | 2.30 | 0.02 |
| CO × LPLT vs. HPHT | –0.01 | 0.05 | –0.11 | 0.09 | –0.21 | 0.84 |
N = 763. HPHT, high parental autonomy support-high teacher autonomy support; HPLT, high parental autonomy support-low teacher autonomy support; LPLT, low parental autonomy support-low teacher autonomy support; and SES, socioeconomic status. 1 coded as 1 = male, 2 = female.