Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 10;1(5):281–287. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2019.07.006

Table 4.

Comparison of Regression Equations Between HbA1c and Average Glucose for Subgroups

Comparison Difference in Slope Difference in Intercept Pa
Age
 2nd vs 1st tertile −10.81 ± 5.23 78.17 ± 38.47 0.13
 3rd vs 2nd tertile −3.54 ± 8.10 31.39 ± 57.07 0.68
 3rd vs 1st tertile −13.57 ± 6.65 108.81 ± 48.1 0.06
Sex
 Male vs female −2.82 ± 6.43 22.37 ± 45.97 0.87
Race
 White vs black −1.27 ± 9.87 0.63 ± 71.08 0.85
 White vs other −8.51 ± 11.95 67.54 ± 90.02 0.74
 Other vs black −6.25 ± 10.67 27.45 ± 85.95 0.48
BMI
 <30 vs ≥30 kg/m2 −12.50 ± 4.85 94.58 ± 35.59 0.53
eGFR
 <20 vs ≥20 mL/min 1.47 ± 4.81 −0.89 ± 35.32 0.43

Note: Values expressed as means ± standard error.

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin.

a

Chi-squared test with 2 df comparing the intercept and slope simultaneously.