Skip to main content
. 2019 May 10;1(3):124–130. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2019.04.003

Table 1.

Participant Characteristics

Patients Not on Dialysis (n = 7) Patients on Dialysis (n = 8) Family Member (n = 6)
Mean age, y 73.6 71.4
Male sex 3 (42.9%) 6 (75%) 0 (0%)
Female sex 4 (57.1%) 2 (25%) 6 (100%)
Race
 White 1 (14.3%) 1 (12.5%) 0 (0%)
 Black 1 (14.3%) 5 (62.5%) 3 (50%)
 Hispanic 3 (42.8%) 1 (12.5%) 2 (33.3%)
 Asian 1 (14.3%) 1 (12.5%) 1 (16.7%)
 Other 1 (14.3%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Primary language
 English 3 (42.8%) 6 (75%) 3 (50%)
 Spanish 2 (28.6%) 1 (12.5%) 2 (33.3%)
 Cantonese 1 (14.3%) 0 (0%) 1 (16.7%)
 Other 1 (14.3%) 1 (12.5%) 0 (0%)
US born 3 (42.9%) 6 (75%) 3 (50%)
Current dialysis state
 Not on dialysis 7 (100%) NA NA
 On in-center hemodialysis NA 6 (75%) NA
 On peritoneal dialysis NA 2 (25%) NA
Received treatment options education 3 (43%) 4 (50%)
Chosen option
 Dialysis 1 (14.3%) 8 (100%) NA
 Undecided 5 (71.4%) 0 (0%) NA
 Forego dialysis 1 (14.3%) 0 (0%) NA
Education
 <5 y 2 (28.6%) 1 (12.5%) 2 (33.3%)
 Some high school 2 (28.6%) 2 (25%) 1 (16.7%)
 Completed high school 1 (14.3%) 1 (12.5%) 1 (16.7%)
 >High school 2 (28.6%) 4 (50%) 1 (16.7%)
Importance of religion
 Very 4 (57.1%) 5 (62.5%) 4 (66.7%)
 Somewhat 1 (14.3%) 1 (12.5%) 1 (16.7%)
 Not at all 0 (0%) 1 (12.5%) 0 (0%)
 No answer 2 (28.6%) 1 (12.5%) 1 (16.7%)
How sure understand patient’s medical condition
 Very sure 4 (57.1%) 5 (62.5%) 3 (50%)
 Somewhat sure 2 (28.6%) 2 (25%) 3 (50%)
 Unsure 1 (14.3%) 1 (12.5%) 0 (0%)
How see patient’s current health
 Very good/excellent 1 (14.3%) 3 (37.5%) 1 (16.7%)
 Fair/good 5 (71.4%) 5 (62.5%) 5 (83.3%)
 Poor 1 (14.3%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
How see patient’s health in 1 y
 Better 1 (14.2%) 6 (75%) 2 (33.3%)
 No change 3 (42.8%) 1 (12.5%) 2 (33.3%)
 Worse 3 (42.8%) 1 (12.5%) 2 (33.3%)

Note: All values are number (percent) unless otherwise noted.

Abbreviation: NA, not applicable.