Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 24.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychology. 2019 Mar 21;33(5):599–608. doi: 10.1037/neu0000532

Table 2.

Estimates and effect sizes for the full longitudinal model of the association of IIV and entorhinal cortical thickness

Estimate S.E. df F t p r

Intercept 4.760 0.150 731.91 1001.20 31.64 <0.001 0.760
Age −0.016 0.002 730.67 60.10 −7.75 <0.001 0.276
Gender −0.029 0.027 731.14 1.13 −1.06 0.288 0.039
APOE ε4 status 0.009 0.031 730.63 0.09 .31 0.760 0.011
Aβ status −0.065 0.031 731.50 4.40 −2.10 0.036 0.077
Mean NP Score* 0.163 0.022 730.99 53.31 7.30 <0.001 0.261
Visit −0.0005 0.0008 701.81 0.38 −0.61 0.539 0.023
Baseline IIV −0.051 0.038 749.07 1.76 −1.33 0.185 0.049
IIV × Visit −0.005 0.0008 720.04 36.72 −6.06 <0.001 0.220

APOE ε4 status = presence or absence of at least one ε4 allele; Aβ = Amyloid-β; IIV = intraindividual cognitive variability; S.E. = standard error of the estimate; df = degrees of freedom.

*

Mean NP score is the mean of the six baseline neuropsychological age-, sex-, and education-adjusted z-scores. The six scores were Animal Fluency and Boston Naming Test (language); Trail Making Test Parts A and B (processing speed/executive); and Auditory Verbal Learning Test Delayed Recall and Recognition (memory).

Significant effects (p < 0.05) appear in bold font.

Effect size (r values) interpretation: small=0.10, medium=0.30, large=0.50 (Cohen, 1992).