. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 24.

Published in final edited form as: J Autism Dev Disord. 2019 Aug;49(8):3244–3256. doi: 10.1007/s10803-019-04037-6

Table 4:

Class percentages of mother and father high and low warmth and criticism

	1 Family Resilient (n = 63; 43%)	2 Family Distressed (n = 18; 12%)	3 Couple Distressed (n = 20; 14%)	4 Mother Distressed with Partner (n = 12; 8%)	5 Mother Low Warmth – Father Low Criticism (n = 35; 24%)
Parent-child relationship
Mother
Warmth (High/Low)	.70/.30	.17/.83	.50/.50	1.00/.00	.00/1.00
Criticism (High/Low)	.08/.92	.61/.39	.10/.90	.00/1.00	.46/.54
Father
Warmth (High/Low)	.64/.37	.00/1.00	.70/.30	.58/.42	.40/.60
Criticism (High/Low)	.03/.97	1.00/.00	.00/1.00	.00/1.00	.00/1.00
Parent couple relationship
Mother
Warmth (High/Low)	.97/.03	.33/.67	.15/.85	.00/1.00	.00/1.00
Criticism (High/Low)	.02/.98	.50/.50	.50/.50	.92/.08	.37/.63
Father
Warmth (High/Low)	.87/.13	.17/.83	.00/1.00	.33/.66	.26/.74
Criticism (High/Low)	.00/1.00	.44/.56	1.00/.00	.00/1.00	.00/1.00

Note. Low warmth combined low and borderline categories from Vaughn & Leff (1976). High criticism combined the high and borderline categories from Magaña et al., (1986).