Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 24;15(7):e0236345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236345

Table 3. Characteristics of studies used to support FDA lung cancer approvals (2006 to 2018) made via the accelerated vs regular pathways and BTD vs non-BTD.

Study characteristics Accelerated vs regular pathways Breakthrough therapy designation (BTD) vs non-BTD
Accelerated pathway Regular pathway Prevalence ratio (95%CI) p-value BTD (%) Non-BTD (%) Prevalence ratio (95%CI) p-value
n (%) n (%)
Study design
Single-arm 11 (85) 5 (21) 4.06 (1.80–9.16) < .001 10 (62) 4 (25) 2.50 (0.99–6.33) 0.073
RCT 2 (15) 19 (79) 6 (38) 12 (75)
Outcome type
Surrogate endpoint 12 (92) 14 (58) 1.58 (1.09–2.30) 0.057 13 (81) 10 (62) 1.30 (0.83–2.30) 0.43
Overall survival 1 (8) 10 (42) 3 (19) 6 (38)
Sample size
<200 9 (69) 7 (29) 2.37 (1.15–4.88) 0.036 9 (56) 9 (56) 2.37 (0.54–1.84) 1.0
≥200 4 (31) 17 (71) 7 (44) 7 (44)
Effect size
Large 5 (38) 6 (25) 1.54 (0.58–4.08) 0.27 7 (44) 2 (13) 3.50 (0.85–14.34) 0.11
Not large 8 (62) 18 (75) 9 (56) 14 (87)