Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 23;8(6):e17650. doi: 10.2196/17650

Table 5.

Performance of the W2V-LPA method when S and Tc were changed.

S a Tc b Precision Recall F1 Size of the lexicon
60 0.5 0.882 0.911 0.896 1694
60 0.55 0.910 0.935 0.922 788
60 0.6 0.926 0.944 0.935 446
60 0.65 0.951 0.963 0.954 275
60 0.7 0.804 0.897 0.848 89
80 0.5 0.880 0.906 0.893 2321
80 0.55 0.916 0.937 0.926 1072
80 0.6 0.934 0.948 0.941 558
80 0.65 0.954 0.963 0.958 320
80 0.7 0.918 0.909 0.892 113
100 0.5 0.874 0.899 0.886 3070
100 0.55 0.906 0.924 0.915 1589
100 0.6 0.927 0.937 0.931 792
100 0.65 0.953 0.959 0.955 418
100 0.7 0.937 0.932 0.925 144
120 0.5 0.855 0.879 0.866 3696
120 0.55 0.889 0.904 0.896 1942
120 0.6 0.924 0.933 0.928 894
120 0.65 0.952 0.958 0.954 454
120 0.7 0.944 0.940 0.934 170

aS: size of the seeds.

bTc: threshold for candidate words.