Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 9;8(3):e18313. doi: 10.2196/18313

Table 2.

Statistical analysis results.

Variables Phase 1 (NoVRa), mean (SD) Phase 2 (YesVRb), mean (SD) df ANOVAc t test P value (Cohen dd)




F test P value Partial η2

STAIe(Form Y-1) score at each time point (TP)






TP1 44.34 (12.38) 40.70 (11.06) 47 1.06 .30

TP2 48.03 (12.67) 41.25 (7.54) 46.19f 2.34 .02 (0.65)

TP3 39.55 (10.60) 41.45 (11.69) 47 –0.59 .56

TP4 31.17 (9.17) 34.75 (8.76) 47 –1.37 .18
STAI (Phase) 47 0.28 .60 0.006
STAI (Time) 3 18.40 <.001 0.281
STAI (Intercept) 3 4.12 .008 0.081
TAIgat each TP








TP1 41.59 (14.07) 41.89 (12.99) 46h –0.77 .94

TP2 42.72 (13.55) 41.21 (11.58) 46h 0.40 .69

TP3 40.62 (13.62) 41.68 (11.48) 46h –0.28 .78

TP4 40.52 (14.40) 41.79 (12.50) 46h –0.32 .75
TAI (Phase) 46h 0.01 .94 <0.001
TAI (Time) 3 0.67 .57 0.014
TAI (Intercept) 3 1.57 .20 0.033
ASEiat each TP








TP1 18.90 (2.43) 19.20 (3.12) 47 –0.38 .70

TP2 18.93 (2.37) 19.45 (3.10) 47 –0.66 .51

TP3 19.79 (2.64) 19.80 (2.93) 47 –0.01 .99

TP4 20.03 (2.76) 20.55 (2.72) 47 –0.65 .52
ASE (Phase) 47 0.22 .64 0.005
ASE (Time) 2.62j 8.98 <.001 0.160
ASE (Intercept) 2.62j 0.40 .73 0.008

aNoVR: subjects not exposed to the virtual reality simulation.

bYesVR: subjects exposed to the virtual reality simulation.

cANOVA: analysis of variance.

dCohen d effect size is only reported for time point 2 (TP2).

eSTAI: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.

fLevene’s Test for Equality of Variances found equal variances not assumed; thus, df was changed accordingly.

gTAI: Test Attitude Inventory.

hPhase 2 (YesVR) had 1 participant fail to complete TAI surveys.

iASE: Academic Self-Efficacy Scale.

jMauchly’s test found sphericity assumption violated; thus, df was corrected using Greenhouse-Geisser estimates of sphericity (ε=.88).