Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 8;8(7):e16365. doi: 10.2196/16365

Table 2.

App scores for each section of the Mobile App Rating Scale user version.

Full app name uMARSa section
Engagement Functionality Esthetics Information App quality App subjective quality Perceived impact
Brush DJ 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.1 3.9 3.5 3.8
Brush Hero 3.9 3.1 4.7 b 3.9 2.5 2.9
Brushing Hero 4.4 4.8 4.7 4.6 4.0 3.3
Brush Monster 5.0 4.8 5.0 4.4 4.8 4.9 4.0
Brush My Teeth 3.7 4.4 4.3 3.1 3.9 3.3 3.2
Brush'n'Save 3.8 5.0 2.5 4.3 3.8 3.9 3.6
Brush Teeth with The Wiggles 4.4 4.8 4.0 4.4 3.5 3.2
Brush Up 4.3 4.6 4.3 4.5 4.4 5.0 4.2
Chomper Chums 4.7 4.6 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.1 4.1
Disney Magic Timer by Oral-B 4.3 4.8 4.2 3.0 4.3 3.1 3.2
Mimizavr Clean Teeth 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.8 4.3 3.5
MyTeeth 3.2 4.6 4.0 3.9 3.3 3.7
My Virtual Tooth - Virtual Pet 4.4 4.6 4.0 4.3 3.6 3.1
Timo Kids Routine Timer 4.0 4.9 4.2 4.4 3.1 3.6
Tooth Hero 4.4 4.0 4.0 2.5 4.5 4.0 3.7
Toothsavers Brushing Game 4.9 4.9 4.8 4.8 4.9 5.0 4.5
Toothy: Toothbrush Timer 3.1 4.4 4.2 4.0 3.9 3.4 3.3
Mean score (SD) 4.15 (0.55) 4.58 (0.46) 4.21 (0.60) 3.90 (0.76) 4.30 (0.36) 3.79 (0.71) 3.58 (0.44)
ICCc,d 0.85 0.71 0.78 0.98 0.56 0.88 0.84

auMARS: Mobile App Rating Scale user version.

bNot available; in 7 out of 17 (41%) apps the “information” quality section could not be assessed because data were not included.

cICC: intraclass correlation coefficient.

dA random effects average measures model with absolute agreement was used for calculated ICCs among two sets of ratings.