TABLE 3.
Polynomial regression with response surface analysis.
Variables | Coefficients | SE |
Constant (b0) | 4.118*** | 0.588 |
Age | –0.070 | 0.105 |
Education | –0.089 | 0.103 |
Employee | 0.286* | 0.186 |
Asset | –0.108 | 0.050 |
Loss orientation coping (LOC) (b1) | 0.053 | 0.085 |
Restoration orientation coping (ROC) (b2) | 0.159 | 0.096 |
LOC squared (b3) | 0.186** | 0.063 |
LOC × ROC (b4) | –0.038 | 0.085 |
ROC squared (b5) | 0.087 | 0.090 |
a1 | 0.212* | 0.102 |
a2 | 0.235* | 0.096 |
a3 | –0.106 | 0.150 |
a4 | 0.311* | 0.145 |
Dependent variable: innovation ambidexterity; significance level: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 (two-tail tests, sample size = 106); a1 = b1 + b2, a2 = b3 + b4 + b5, a3 = b1 – b2, and a4 = b3 – b4 + b5, where b1 is the coefficient for LOC, b2 is the coefficient for ROC, b3 is the coefficient for LOC squared, b4 is the coefficient for LOC × ROC, b5 is the coefficient for LOC squared.