TABLE 4.
Polynomial regression with response surface analysis.
| Variables |
Exploitative innovation |
Exploratory innovation |
||
| Coefficients | SD | Coefficients | SD | |
| Constant (b0) | 3.572*** | 0.732 | 4.664*** | 0.528 |
| Age | –0.056 | 0.130 | –0.083 | 0.094 |
| Education | –0.074 | 0.128 | –0.104 | 0.092 |
| Employee | −0.121† | 0.062 | −0.095* | 0.045 |
| Asset | 0.365 | 0.231 | 0.207 | 0.167 |
| Loss orientation coping (LOC) (b1) | 0.050 | 0.106 | 0.055 | 0.076 |
| Restoration orientation coping (ROC) (b2) | 0.276* | 0.120 | 0.043 | 0.086 |
| LOC squared (b3) | 0.238** | 0.079 | 0.134* | 0.057 |
| LOC × ROC (b4) | –0.045 | 0.106 | –0.030 | 0.076 |
| ROC squared (b5) | 0.111 | 0.112 | 0.064 | 0.081 |
| a1 | 0.326* | 0.133 | 0.098 | 0.096 |
| a2 | 0.304* | 0.134 | 0.168† | 0.087 |
| a3 | –0.226 | 0.183 | 0.012 | 0.131 |
| a4 | 0.394* | 0.181 | 0.228† | 0.129 |
Dependent variable: exploitative innovation, exploratory innovation; significance level: †p < 0.10; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 (two-tail tests, sample size = 106); a1 = b1 + b2, a2 = b3 + b4 + b5, a3 = b1 – b2, and a4 = b3 – b4 + b5, where b1 is the coefficient for LOC, b2 is the coefficient for ROC, b3 is the coefficient for LOC squared, b4 is the coefficient for LOC × ROC, b5 is the coefficient for LOC squared.