Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 10;11:381. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00381

Table 2A.

Breast cancer risk in DTC survivors and/or DTC survivors given RAI: cohort and case-control studies from USA.

References, country Study design, setting Study period, length of FU (y), exclusion if FU < x (y), lost to FU (%) Age range or mean age at DTC diagnosis (y) DTC cases (TC), DTC with RAI (TR) BC cases (BT), BC with RAI (BR) BC risk after DTC (BT), BC risk after RAI (BR), Risks (95% CI) BC risk status After DTC BC risk status after RAI
Vassilopoulou-Sellin et al. (16), USA Cohort study, University of Texas and SEER registry 1944–1997, <2 y 42 y TC 1,013 BT 24,
BR 14
All ages RR(BT) = 3.9 (0.5–28.6), 40–49 y RR(BT) = 3.0 (1.17–8.62)
Chen et al. (17), USA Cohort study SEER Registry 1973–1994 <2 y 48.6 y TC 23,080 BT 252 RR(BT) = 3.9 (1.04–1.33)
Ronckers et al. (18), USA Cohort study SEER Registry 1973–2000, 8 y, <2 mo 43 y TC 29,456 BT 530,
BR 53
O/E(BT) = 1.21 (1.11–1.32), O/E(BR) = 1.18 vs. O/E (no BR) = 1.28
Bhattacharyya et al. (19), USA Cohort study SEER Registry 1988–2001, RAI 5.2 y, no RAI 4.7 y, RAI 43.5 y,
no RAI 54 y
TC 29,231, TR 10,349 BT 424,
BR 112
Prevalence of BR 1.08% of BT without RAI 1.6%,
Chuang et al. (20), USA Cohort study SEER Registry 1973–2000, RAI 15 y no RAI 11.1 y, <6 mo >18 y TC 26,639 BT 462,
BR 344
RR(BT) = 1.02 (0.81–1.29), RR(BR) = 0.86 (0.6–1.24)
Brown et al. (3), USA Cohort study SEER Registry 1973–2002, 8.6 y 42 y TC 30,278 BT 597,
BR 76
All ages O/E(BT) = 1.22 (1.12–1.32), <25y O/E(BT) = 1.16 (0.58–2.08) All ages O/E(BR) = 1.21 (0.95–1.52)
Kim et al. (21), USA Cohort study SEER Registry 1973–2008 TC 52,103 BT 1,041 SIR(BT) = 1.13 (1.06–1.20), SIR(BR) = 1.14 (0.98–1.31)
Kuo et al. (22), USA Cohort study, SEER Registry 1990–2011 46 y TC 38,158, TR 16,670 BT 954,
BR 384
OR(BT) = 1.02 (1.01–1.02), OR(BR) = 0.94 (0.82–1.08)
Uprety et al. (23), USA Cohort study SEER Registry 2004–2010, <6 mo, 12.8 y >18 y TC 12,603 BT 291 O/E(BT) = 1.19 (1.06–1.34)
Endo et al. (24), USA Cohort study, SEER Registry 1992–2013, <6 mo 61 y TC 75,992 BT 727,
BR 245
O/E(BT) = 1.17 (1.09–1.26), O/E (BR) = 1.08 (0.95–4.7), O/E(no BR) = 1.12 (1.01–1.24)
Adly et al. (25), USA Cohort study, SEER Registry 1973–2013 16 y TC 1,769 BT 9 SIR (BT) = 0.96 (0.44–1.83)
Ron et al. (26), USA Cohort study, Connecticut Tumor Registry 1935–1978, <2, mo1 6% 47.3 y TC 1,618,
TR 281
BT 34,
BR 8
SIR(BT) = 1.89 (1.31–2.64), SIR(BR) = 2.57 (1.1–5.07)
Simon et al. (27), USA Case-control study National Institute of Child Health and Human 1961–1995 35–64 y TC 23 BT 4,575 OR(BT) = 2.7 (1.2–5.9)
Canchola et al. (28), USA Cohort study, California Cancer Registry 1988–1999, <1 y TC 10,932 BT invasive 78,
BT in situ 23
SIR (invasive) = 0.9 (0.7–1.1), SIR (in situ) = 1.6 (1.0–2.4)

Some data may be absent in particular rows if the data were not reported in the publication. Up arrows (⇑) denote increased risk, horizontal arrows ⇔ denote no increased risk. Unless otherwise noted, the “DTC patients” group includes both patients receiving RAI and those not receiving RAI.

BC, breast cancer; CI, confidence interval; DTC, differentiated thyroid cancer; FU, follow-up; O/E, observed/expected ratio; OR, odds ratio; RAI, radioiodine therapy; RR, relative risk; SIR, standardized incidence ratio.