Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jul 22.
Published in final edited form as: Neuron. 2020 May 18;107(2):338–350.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.04.022

Figure 3: Monocular orientation representations are distinct before eye-opening.

Figure 3:

(A) Widefield orientation preference maps for naive (top) and experienced (bottom) animals for contralateral (left) and ipsilateral (right) visual stimuli. Overlay of the corresponding homogeneity maps for each eye is shown middle. Preferred orientation and selectively are represented by image hue and saturation. Grayed or blacked out regions represent blood vessels.

(B-C) Circular correlation of preferred orientation (B) and Pearson’s correlation of fine-network structure (C, homogeneity index) for monocular orientation preference maps in naive and experienced animals (mean±SEM). Gray and black dots reflect individual or grouped measurements.

(D) Pairwise cellular distance-dependent, difference in the cellular monocular mismatch for naive and experienced animals (mean±SEM).

Asterisks denote significance between groups in (B-C) and distances where clustering is significantly lower than chance in (D) (*: p<0.05, **:p<0.01). Animal experiments: naive (n=3 cellular and n=6 widefield) and experienced (n=3 cellular and n=7 widefield).