Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 20;36(8):1533–1542. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-01850-4

Table 1.

Qualitative image quality scores for delineation of outer vs. inner vessel walls of the thoracic aorta

Aortic level Average Reader 1 Reader 2 Weighted κ (95% CI)
Sinuses of Valsalva
 Inner 1.5 ± 0.5 1.5 ± 0.6 1.5 ± 0.6 0.86 (0.70–1.0)
 Outer 2.1 ± 0.7 2.1 ± 0.7 2.1 ± 0.8 0.78 (0.62–0.93)
 P-value (t-test)  < 0.001  < 0.001  < 0.001 NA
Sinotubular junction
 Inner 1.6 ± 0.5 1.6 ± 0.5 1.5 ± 0.5 0.74 (0.53–0.95)
 Outer 2.3 ± 0.6 2.3 ± 0.7 2.3 ± 0.6 0.62 (0.42–0.82)
 P-value (t-test)  < 0.001  < 0.001  < 0.001 NA
Ascending aorta
 Inner 1.3 ± 0.5 1.3 ± 0.6 1.3 ± 0.6 0.82 (0.65–0.99)
 Outer 2.1 ± 0.6 2.1 ± 0.6 2.2 ± 0.6 0.79 (0.57–1.0)
 P-value (t-test)  < 0.001  < 0.001  < 0.001 NA
Mid-aortic arch
 Inner 1.2 ± 0.4 1.3 ± 0.5 1.2 ± 0.4 0.86 (0.69–1.0)
 Outer 2.1 ± 0.6 2.1 ± 0.6 2.1 ± 0.6 0.79 (0.60–0.97)
 P-value (t-test)  < 0.001  < 0.001  < 0.001 NA
Descending aorta
 Inner 1.2 ± 0.4 1.2 ± 0.5 1.1 ± 0.3 0.85 (0.65–1.0)
 Outer 2.4 ± 0.5 2.4 ± 0.5 2.4 ± 0.5 0.84 (0.66–1.0)
 P-value (t-test)  < 0.001  < 0.001  < 0.001 NA

T-test was performed for comparison of mean differences. Significant differences are in bold (significant at p < 0.05)

A four point-scale regarding sharp anatomic delineation of inner and outer edges of the vessel was used: 1 = excellent definition with sharp delineation and high contrast; 2 = well defined with good contrast; 3 = poorly defined with low contrast; 4 = not visualized

NA  not  applicable