Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 24;16(8):83. doi: 10.1007/s11306-020-01703-0

Table 2.

Comparison of relative distribution based on quartiles of measured clinical lipid concentration and the concentration predicted from dried blood spot samples

Dutch Famine Birth Cohort (plasma)
‘Desirable’ ‘Borderline’ ‘Poor’
Triglyceride Overlap* 144 16 34
% Overlap 90.5 64.0 72.3
HDL Overlap* 82 23 45
% Overlap 73.2 56.1 57.7
LDL Overlap* 30 147 13
% Overlap 85.7 89.1 41.9
Total Cholesterol Overlap* 3 135 12
% Overlap 100.0 64.6 63.1
Amsterdam Born Children and their Development Cohort (dried blood spots)
1st Quartile 2nd Quartile 3rd Quartile 4th Quartile
Triglyceride Overlap* 36 32 32 44
% Overlap 60.0 53.3 53.3 73.3
HDL Overlap* 37 24 21 35
% Overlap 61.7 40.0 35.0 58.3
LDL Overlap* 34 20 22 36
% Overlap 56.7 33.3 36.7 60.0
Total Cholesterol Overlap* 35 21 20 34
% Overlap 58.3 35.0 33.3 56.7

Overlap* the number of samples with the measured and predicted lipid concentrations falling in the same quartile. Triglyceride ‘Desirable’ < 1.7 mmol/l, ‘Borderline’ 1.7–2.2 mmol/l, ‘Poor’ > 2.2 mmol/l, HDL ‘Desirable’ > 1.5 mmol/l, ‘Borderline’ 1.5–1.1 mmol/l, ‘Poor’ < 1.2.2 mmol/l, LDL ‘Desirable’ < 2.6 mmol/l, ‘Borderline’ 2.6–5.0 mmol/l, ‘Poor’ > 5.0 mmol/l, Total cholesterol ‘Desirable’ < 5.2 mmol/l, ‘Borderline’ 5.2–6.2 mmol/l, ‘Poor’ > 6.2 mmol/l