Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 22;58:102909. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102909

Table 6.

Estimated sensitivity, specificity and AUC from different logistic discriminant models in the training and test datasets.

Covariates Training set (n = 260)*
Test set (n = 171)*
Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) AUCa (95% CI) Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) AUCa (95% CI)
Log2 IL1-ra, Log2 IL7, Log2 IP10, age group, BMI-for-age z-score (model M1–1) 70•0 (50•6, 85•3) 72•1 (65•8, 77•8) 0•71 (0•62, 0•80) 76•4 (64•9, 85•6) 72•8 (62•6, 81•6) 0•75 (0•68, 0•81)
Log2 IL1-ra, Log2 IL7, Log2 IP10, age group, BMI-for-age z-score, interaction Log2 IL7 and BMI-for-age (model M1–2) 70•0 (50•6, 85•3) 72•5 (66•2, 78•2) 0•71 (0•62, 0•80) 75•0 (63•4, 84•5) 73•9 (63•7, 82•5) 0•74 (0•68, 0•81)
Log2 IL1-ra, Log2 IL7, Log2 IP10, age group, BMI-for-age z-score, interaction Log2 IL7and BMI-for-age (model M1–3) 70•0 (50•6, 85•3) 72•5 (66•2, 78•2) 0•71 (0•62, 0•80) 76•4 (64•9, 85•6) 72•8 (62•6, 81•6) 0•75 (0•68, 0•81)
Log2 IL1-ra, Log2 IL7, Log2 IP10, age group, BMI-for-age z-score, interaction Log2 IP10 and BMI-for-age (model M1–4) 73•3 (54•1, 87•7) 73•8 (67•6, 79•4) 0•74 (0•65, 0•82) 72•2 (60•4, 82•1) 75•0 (64•9, 83•4) 0•74 (0•67, 0•81)

423 children (training set: 259; test set: 164) ultimately included in the discriminant analyses: six children (training set: 1; test set: 5) had very implausible BMI-for-age z-scores i.e. z-scores ≤ −5 or ≥ 5, and two children in test set had missing BMI-for-age z-scores. aArea under the receiver operator characteristic curve. Age group is a binary variable i.e. < 5 years old and ≥ 5 years old.